PSI Structural Biology Knowledgebase

PSI | Structural Biology Knowledgebase
Header Icons

Related Articles
Signaling: A Platform for Opposing Functions
May 2015
Protein Folding and Misfolding: It's the Journey, Not the Destination
March 2015
Molecular Portraits of the Cell
February 2015
Nuclear Pore Complex: A Flexible Transporter
February 2015
Nuclear Pore Complex: Higher Resolution of Macromolecules
February 2015
Nuclear Pore Complex: Integrative Approach to Probe Nup133
February 2015
Piecing Together the Nuclear Pore Complex
February 2015
Updating ModBase
January 2015
Transmembrane Spans
December 2014
Mining Protein Dynamics
May 2014
Novel Proteins and Networks: Assigning Function
May 2014
Cancer Networks: Predicting Catalytic Residues from 3D Protein Structures
November 2013
The Immune System: A Brotherhood of Immunoglobulins
June 2013
The Immune System: Super Cytokines
June 2013
Infectious Diseases: Targeting Meningitis
May 2013
PDZ Domains
April 2013
Protein Interaction Networks: Adding Structure to Protein Networks
April 2013
Design and Discovery: Flexible Backbone Protein Redesign
February 2013
Pocket changes
July 2012
Predictive protein origami
July 2012
Refining protein structure prediction
March 2012
Metal mates
February 2012
Devil is in the details
January 2012
Playing while you work
November 2011
Docking and rolling
October 2011
Fit to serve
October 2011
Rosetta hone
July 2011
Structure from sequence
July 2011
An easier solution for symmetry
June 2011
Solutions in the solution
June 2011
Regulating nitrogen assimilation
January 2011
Guard cells pick up the SLAC
December 2010
Alpha/Beta Barrels
October 2010
Modeling RNA structures
May 2010
Deducing function from small structural clues
February 2010
Spot the pore
January 2010
Network coverage
November 2009
GPCR modeling: any good?
August 2009
Protein modeling made easy
July 2009
Model proteins in your lunch break
April 2009
Click for cancer-protein interactions
December 2008
Modeling with SAXS
October 2008
Designing activity
September 2008

Technology Topics Modeling

Playing while you work

SBKB [doi:10.1038/sbkb.2011.49]
Technical Highlight - November 2011
Short description: Foldit players successfully solve the crystal structure of a retroviral protease that had resisted previous determination.

The structure of M-PMV PR solved using the results produced by Foldit players. 1

According to the proverb, “All work and no play make Jack a dull boy,” but what if Jack could work and play at the same time? Recently, researchers gave players of the online game Foldit two separate opportunities to do just that. Foldit challenges players worldwide (no advanced understanding of protein structure needed) to solve protein structure puzzles, creating a platform that is amenable to crowd-sourcing protein modeling problems.

The first challenge was to use Foldit for challenges in the 2010 Critical Assessment of Techniques for Protein Structure Prediction (CASP). Foldit was entered as an independent group to see how players compared to other approaches. The results showed that Foldit players tended to focus on local energy minima, making them not as successful in most areas. However, when attempting refinement or de novo structural prediction, the Foldit Void Crushers group produced the best models in each of those categories in the CASP challenge, demonstrating the utility of the approach and mindset of Foldit players for these areas.

The second challenge was to use Foldit to predict the structure of a protein that has resisted structural determination. Over a span of 10 years, automated methods had repeatedly failed at solving the structure of the protease from the simian AIDS–causing Mason-Pfizer Monkey Virus (M-PMV PR). Baker and colleagues gave Foldit players 3 weeks to work with models derived from the NMR coordinates of M-PMV PR, and made sure that the starting models had poor Rosetta scores so as to avoid players being trapped in local energy minima. By the end of the challenge, one team, the Foldit Contenders group, amazingly produced a model that was successfully used to solve the crystal structure of M-PMV PR by molecular replacement.

The results of these two challenges highlight the potential of approaching structural problems differently, and also reveal pitfalls to be avoided. More importantly, the result of the M-PMV PR in particular demonstrates that online games and crowd-sourcing have the potential to provide fresh insights and solutions to long-standing problems.

Steve Mason


  1. F. Khatib et al. Crystal structure of a monomeric retroviral protease solved by protein folding game players.
    Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. (18 September 2011). doi:10.1038/nsmb.2119

Structural Biology Knowledgebase ISSN: 1758-1338
Funded by a grant from the National Institute of General Medical Sciences of the National Institutes of Health