PSI Structural Biology Knowledgebase

PSI | Structural Biology Knowledgebase
Header Icons

Related Articles
Microbiome: Expanding the Gut Gene Catalog
November 2014
Complex Search
September 2014
Repairing a Rift
September 2014
iTRAQing the Ubiquitinome
July 2014
Immunity: Clustering Immunoglobulins
June 2014
Mining Protein Dynamics
May 2014
Design and Discovery: Identifying New Enzymes and Metabolic Pathways
January 2014
Epigenetics: Tracing Histone Demethylase Inhibitors
December 2013
Cancer Networks: Predicting Catalytic Residues from 3D Protein Structures
November 2013
Protein-Nucleic Acid Interaction: Inhibition Through Allostery
July 2013
Infectious Diseases: Targeting Meningitis
May 2013
Protein Interaction Networks: Reading Between the Lines
April 2013
Design and Discovery: A Cocktail for Proteins Without ID
February 2013
Targeting Enzyme Function with Structural Genomics
July 2012
More in one
June 2012
Disordered Proteins
February 2012
RNA Chaperone NMB1681
July 2011
Capsid assembly in motion
April 2011
One at a time
April 2011
A growing family
February 2011
Predicting functions within a superfamily
January 2011
Isoxanthopterin Deaminase
November 2010
Scaling up mutational scanning
November 2010
Alpha/Beta Barrels
October 2010
Mre11 Nuclease
May 2010
Assigning protein function: GeMMA
April 2010
Face off
October 2009

Technology Topics Annotation/Function

Predicting functions within a superfamily

SBKB [doi:10.1038/sbkb.2010.59]
Technical Highlight - January 2011
Short description: A detailed analysis of the HUP superfamily provides the groundwork for automated function prediction.

Examples of HUP embellishment being involved in different aspects of molecular function (Ref. 1)

Proteins are composed of domains, and these protein domains can be grouped into superfamilies on the basis of their similarity. The size of these families varies considerably, and for some of the largest it seems that the protein domains within a family have developed diverse functions. Understanding how these differences arise might allow researchers to accurately predict functions.

This is the aim of a recent study by Christine Orengo and colleagues from PSI MCSG. They examine in detail one superfamily, the HUP domains. This family has a range of structures and functions: it includes various enzymes that catalyze reactions without a common mechanism, and it also includes non-enzymes.

The team classified by hand all the known structures according to the literature available on their function. Specific information, such as choice of substrate, was then used to further categorize domains within these subgroups. The results didn't fit within an already established classification framework and, instead, a new system had to be devised. This is a time-consuming approach and is not suitable for large-scale analyses.

The study shows that the main structural and functional differences within the HUP domain arose from 'embellishments', or additions, to the core structure, as previously suspected. In addition, from the new classification it was clear that certain residues were conserved within functional subgroups but not across the whole superfamily.

Using this information, the authors developed guidelines, which they then fed into an automatic protocol to classify domains with regard to their function. This protocol should be useful for classifying other large superfamilies, taking us a step nearer to accurately predicting function from structures or sequences.

Maria Hodges


  1. B.H. Dessailly et al. Detailed analysis of function divergence in a large and diverse domain superfamily: toward a refined protocol of function classification.
    Structure 18, 1522-1535 (2010). doi:10.1016/j.str.2010.08.017

Structural Biology Knowledgebase ISSN: 1758-1338
Funded by a grant from the National Institute of General Medical Sciences of the National Institutes of Health