PSI Structural Biology Knowledgebase

PSI | Structural Biology Knowledgebase
Header Icons

Related Articles
Families in Gene Neighborhoods
June 2015
Expanding the Reach of SAD
April 2015
Greasing the Path for SFX
January 2015
Time-Resolved Crystallography with HATRX
December 2014
Structures Without Damage
August 2014
Error Prevention
July 2014
A Refined Refinement Strategy
May 2014
Membrane Proteome: Microcrystals Yield Big Data
April 2014
Optimizing Damage
February 2014
Getting Better at Low Resolution
January 2014
Building a Structural Library
November 2013
Drug Discovery: Identifying Dynamic Networks by CONTACT
October 2013
Microbiome: Solid-State NMR, Crystallized
September 2013
Fluorescence- and Chromatography-Based Protein Thermostability Assay
October 2012
Insert Here
October 2012
Native phasing
August 2012
Smaller may be better
April 2012
Metal mates
February 2012
Not so cool
December 2011
One from many
August 2011
Rosetta hone
July 2011
Solutions in the solution
June 2011
Beyond crystals, solutions, and powders
May 2011
Snapshot crystallography
March 2011
FERM-ly bound
February 2011
A new amphiphile for crystallizing membrane proteins
January 2011
'Super-resolution' large complexes
December 2010
Proteinase K and Digalacturonic Acid
September 2010
Some crystals like it hot
May 2010
Tips for crystallizing membrane proteins in lipidic mesophases
February 2010
Tackling the phase problem
November 2009
Crystallizing glycoproteins
September 2009
Crystals from recalcitrant proteins
August 2009
Tips for crystallizing membrane proteins
June 2009
Chaperone-assisted crystallography
March 2009
An “X-ray” ruler
January 2009
Methylation boosts protein crystallization
December 2008

Technology Topics Crystallography

Methylation boosts protein crystallization

PSI-SGKB [doi:10.1038/th_psisgkb.2008.18]
Technical Highlight - December 2008
Short description: Reductive methylation is a simple, inexpensive and efficient method for improving the quality of protein crystals for structural studies.Nat. Meth. 5, 853-854 (2008)

Producing diffraction-quality protein crystals can be a huge problem and is a major bottleneck in X-ray crystallography. Several methods have been developed in an attempt to overcome this obstacle. One promising technique is chemical modification of proteins using reductive methylation.

Dimethyl lysine (dmLys) promotes intermolecular interactions. dmLys A62 in the structure of VPA0580 from Vibrio parahaemolyticus (PDB 2QHQ) makes contact with Glu A35 and the main-chain carbonyl of Leu A91.

This approach results in methylation of the solvent-exposed ε-amino group of lysines, which changes the protein's surface and biophysical properties (such as pI, solubility and hydropathy). Previous studies using this method indicated that methylation generally does not affect the protein's function and structure.

Now, a team from the PSI MCSG has carried out a large-scale test of the general applicability of the method. The team analysed 370 proteins from diverse protein families, with no sequence homologs within the set. Of these proteins, 269 had produced poor-quality crystals unsuitable for diffraction studies, 85 had failed to crystallize, and 16 were a reference set.

Kim et al. used a simple method involving the addition of 1 M formaldehyde and 1 M dimethylamine–borane complex (ABC) as a reducing agent. After reductive methylation, they obtained diffraction-quality crystals for 40 out of the 370 proteins, and so far have solved 26 crystal structures. The crystallization success rate did not correlate with the number of lysines, pI, hydropathy or molecular weight.

The MCSG team solved structures of four proteins that had not been methylated and compared them with the same proteins after methylation. The structures were virtually identical and the resolution of the methylated structures was better than that of their native counterparts. The results suggest that methylation produces a similar effect to the replacement of lysine residues with arginine, another approach to improving protein crystallization.

This reductive methylation technique produced an overall success rate, from purified protein to a structure, of 7.0% for proteins that did not produce useable structures during the initial crystallization trials, and allowed structure determination of some proteins that failed to crystallize in their native state.

Maria Hodges


  1. Kim Youngchang, Pearl Quartey, Hui Li, Lour Volkart, Catherine Hatzos et al. Large-scale evaluation of protein reductive methylation for improving protein crystallization.
    Nat. Meth. 5, 853-854 (2008). doi:10.1038/nmeth1008-853

Structural Biology Knowledgebase ISSN: 1758-1338
Funded by a grant from the National Institute of General Medical Sciences of the National Institutes of Health